CompetenciesPolicies, Procedures, & Handbooks Training Jury Trial & Arbitration Employment and Labor Law Education
Daniel G. Fritz represents the interests of management in all areas of labor and employment law. Prior to joining McMahon Berger, Dan spent four years with The Boeing Company in the Phantom Works Contracts and Pricing Department where he successfully reviewed and negotiated contracts and agreements on Boeing’s behalf.
As a traditional labor attorney, Dan provides day-to-day counsel on problems arising under collective bargaining agreements, such as discipline and application of work rules, as well as matters arising under the National Labor Relations Act. Dan also serves as the spokesperson for employers during labor negotiations and assists employers with various labor matters, including union avoidance, elections, strikes, arbitrations, and unfair labor practice charges and petitions filed before the National Labor Relations Board.
Dan practices in all facets of employment law, including employment discrimination claims under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. He is also involved in litigating employment discrimination claims as well as investigating and responding on behalf of management to employee claims before administrative agencies. In addition to representing clients in federal and state court and before federal and state agencies, Dan’s practice includes counseling clients on employment-related matters and drafting personnel policies, employment contracts, severance agreements, non-compete agreements, and employee handbooks.
Truman State University
St. Louis University
Admitted To Practice
- State of Missouri
- United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
- United States District Court, Western District of Missouri
- United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Blog Posts by
Daniel G. Fritz View All
An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) for the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) recently held that Valley Hospital Medical Center could rely upon language in an...
For several years now we have been tracking the controversial 2016 Persuader Rule, which would have expanded the reporting requirements for employers and consultants when...